Dust Explosions: Another Bush Administration disaster.
Its almost as if everything the Bush Administration does badly, comes back to haunt innocent Americans. We all know, of course, that nearly every agency in the United States is a Republican controlled faction. Of course, with the introduction of the Democrats as the party leaders of the House and the Senate, these things are changing, albeit slowly. Of course, when it comes to Presidential appointed leaders, there is little, if anything, that the Democrats can do to stop the process. This is especially true because of the latest series of catastropies to hit the United States.
The lastest is the oversight which is lead by OSHA, or Occupations Safety and Health Administration. The leader of OSHA,
This is the article about the rejection of new Safety Standards regarding Dust Particles IN 2006 at Industrial Sites and Plants, like the sugar plant which exploded in Savannah last week.
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8UMELQ80.htm
Top federal safety officials urged the Labor Department in 2006 to adopt
critical regulations to prevent deadly dust explosions -- like the one suspected
in the deadly blast in a Georgia sugar plant Thursday -- but the government has
failed to do so.
In the past 28 years, about 300 dust explosions have killed
more than 120 workers and injured several hundred others in sugar plants, food
processors, and many industrial and wood manufacturers. Most are preventable by
removing fine-grain dust as it builds up, experts say.
But that has not been
required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, which is part of
the Labor Department. The U.S. Chemical Safety Board, which investigates
industrial accidents, concluded in a report in 2006 that OSHA had no
comprehensive regulation to prevent dust explosions and that its program
"inadequately addresses" the problem.
A 20-year-old OSHA dust regulation
aimed only at grain plants and silos is effective, the safety board said, and
shows why regulations are needed for other companies.
OSHA officials said
they began stepped-up enforcement on dust issues in October, but other safety
officials say that's not enough and that detailed dust safety regulations are
needed.
"This is an extremely dangerous component that is not regulated,"
former safety board chairwoman Carolyn Merritt told The Associated Press Friday.
Dust explosion situations "are so dangerous that people have got to pay
attention to this. There should be an outcry."Two California Democrats in Congress who serve on labor panels, George Miller and Lynn Woolsey, wrote the labor secretary Friday, saying, "a mandatory combustible dust standard should be a high priority of OSHA. ... We strongly urge you to act now."
By law OSHA was supposed to respond within six months to the safety board's November 2006 recommendations to adopt a mandatory regulation. Except for a letter a year ago acknowledging receipt of the report and its recent special enforcement emphasis, it has not done so, officials said.
Merritt, who was appointed in 2002 by President Bush and left the board last year, said she and her colleagues repeatedly pressed OSHA to do something.
"There really isn't a lot of excuse," she said. "The question is why are they hesitant to write new regulations when it's been proven -- when our special study has shown -- how serious it was and how many fatalities there were."
This is the Article about OSHA and how it leaves safety Standards to the Bush Administration.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/25/washington/25osha.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Since George
W. Bush became president, OSHA has issued the fewest significant standards
in its history, public health experts say. It has imposed only one major safety
rule. The only significant health standard it issued was ordered by a federal
court.
The agency has killed dozens of existing and proposed regulations and
delayed adopting others. For example, OSHA has repeatedly identified silica
dust, which can cause lung cancer, and construction site noise as health hazards
that warrant new safeguards for nearly three million workers, but it has yet to
require them.
“The people at OSHA have no interest in running a regulatory
agency,” said Dr. David Michaels, an occupational health expert at George
Washington University who has written extensively about workplace safety.
“If they ever knew how to issue regulations, they’ve forgotten. The concern
about protecting workers has gone out the window.”
Agency officials defend
their performance, saying that workplace deaths and injuries have declined
during their tenure. They have been considering new standards and revising
outdated ones that were unduly burdensome on businesses, they said, adding that
they have moved cautiously on new rules because those require extensive
scientific and economic analysis.

